Thursday, December 26, 2019

Genetically Modified Organisms Are Dangerous Or Bad For...

Throughout history, scientists and inventors around the world have worked persistently toward developing new technologies and practices in order to impact and benefit the lives of the people around them. Additionally, things that once seemed impossible, are now possible, thanks to the ingenious ideas of inventors and scientists from the past or present. More recently, scientists have been working on developing new forms of technology regarding genetic modification. This involves the transfer of genes from one plant or animal, to another similar specimen. Furthermore, with the help of genetically modified organisms, scientists are now able to help prevent pollution, increase crop productivity, as well as aid in medicinal purposes. To begin, due to a past study that linked genetic engineering to the following possibilities such as stomach inflammation, the transfer of genetically modified DNA to humans who consume certain crops, and the presence of the chemical Glyphosate which has been linked to certain birth defects; many people have developed the belief that genetically modified organisms are dangerous or bad for our citizen’s health. However, there are several creatable examples that could contradict these assumptions. First of all, with new genetic engineering technology scientists are now able to reduce the development of pollution created by pesticides. This is accomplished by implanting a gene into the germinated seed that allows it to produce its own toxins toShow MoreRelatedGenetically Modified Organisms And The Environment1284 Words   |  6 Pagesabout genetically modified organisms and think that they are god sent other countries are weary of them and think that they are dangerous. While m any other countries label genetically modified organisms because they think that people should have a choice whether or not they want to consume them America believes that their people should not have to know therefore taking the people s choice away and making the decision for them. There have been studies that have shown that genetically modified organismsRead MoreGenetically Modified Organisms ( Gmos )1236 Words   |  5 PagesOver the last two decades, there has been a significant increase in food products containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs). GMOs are substances which have had their genetic material altered through unnatural processes. Since the advent of the first GMO in 1973, the modification of plants and animals through the introduction of a new trait or the alteration of a gene has significantly increased (Aleksejeva 5). With increasing genetic modifications of plants and animals for food products andRead MoreGenetically Modified Organisms ( Gmos )1105 Words à ‚  |  5 PagesDoppelgà ¤nger Over the last two decades, there has been a significant increase in food products containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs). GMOs are substances which have had their genetic material altered through unnatural processes. Since the advent of the first GMO in 1973, the modification of plants and animals through the introduction of a new trait or the alteration of a gene has significantly increased (Aleksejeva 5). With increasing genetic modifications of plants and animals for foodRead MoreGenetically Modified Foods Essay1171 Words   |  5 Pages Introduction. Genetically modified foods are foods produced from organisms that have had specific changes (adding, deleting, changing segments) introduced into their DNA using the methods of genetic engineering.(King 2009) So they could produce desirable traits or eliminate undesirable traits, a process that enables transfer of genes between different species that would not interbreed in nature. 1983 marked the first ever transgenic plant. This was a tobacco plant that was created with antibioticRead MoreShort Essay On How To Feed The Planet1596 Words   |  7 Pagesthat we can’t feed 10 billion people with a food supply for only 7 billion. Fortunately genetically modified foods have been the answer to this problem for many years; we just havent learned to embrace them. Although genetically modified foods have presented health risks in the past, this correctable problem along with many other benefits make them the future source of food for the human race. Genetically modified foods (GMOs) are created through the process of genetic engineering. This process allowsRead MoreGenetically Modified Foods For Humans1991 Words   |  8 Pages1996, genetically modified organisms was introduced and has been a prevalence in America. People used the bio-engineering technology to grow crops and create DNA-Altered livestock in order to get better foods for humans. Nowadays, we could see genetically modified organisms exist in nearly 70% crop in U.S., it has take place of the non-bioengineered food at homes and restaurants. In the process of using genetically modified foods, lots of people are doubting the safety of genetically modified foodsRead MoreGenetic Engineering : The Uncertain Future2161 Words   |  9 Pagesexperimental methods scientists would use to genetically engineer a human. The technology is advancing, and genetic engineering could be a huge medical breakthrough but, there is no one to set limits on this new technology which makes it vulnerable to misuse and abuse by wealthy people who could afford to get their child genetically engineered. Keywords: Genetics, Genetic Engineering, Society, Ethics, Disease, Control, Children, Parents, Genome, Technology, Health. Genetics: The Future Is NearRead MoreWhy Food Labeling Is Mandatory For Gmos2370 Words   |  10 Pagesfood, clothing and shelter are just some of those most basic needs. We, as humans, have been striving to conquer nature in order to make our lives easier. As we have occupied this earth for thousands of years and survived plagues and wars, one of our most basic needs has always challenged us; how to make more food to satisfy an ever growing population. Eventually our technology afforded us the ability to modify food to preserve it longer and grow more without fear of pests or blights. However, in doingRead MoreThe Harmful Effects Of Genetically Modified Foods2292 Words   |  10 Pagescontinue to ignore the serious physiological effects of genetically modified foods, and pollution in water. In the 21st century, governments and corporations must be held accountable, which range from cancer, brain damage, clinical depression to criminal activities. Continued lack of political will and the prevalence of concern for profit over health is unethical. Majority of the working class in America working minimum wage and cannot afford health care to cure their illness. The lack of media attentionRead More Frankenfoods Essay2563 Words   |  11 PagesFrankenfoods Biotechnology and genetically modified organisms have gained quite a bit of notoriety in the past decade. Proponents of biotechnology are claiming that genetic modification will revolutionize agriculture and medicine and overall benefit human kind far beyond the reaches of imagination. On the other side of the issue, there are those who claim that genetic modification is dangerous and unneeded. But is either side correct? Will GMOs revolutionize the food and health industries or will they cause

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Should There Be A Minimum Wage - 3645 Words

Andre’ Moss-Hayes Mr. Hance Senior English 05 December 2014 Should There Be A Minimum Wage? In today’s times, there is a lot of debate going on about the wages of workers all around the nation. The major question is: Should there be a minimum wage salary that a person can earn? Securing employment is not easy to do in the U.S. at this time, and the rate of compensation is low. When people are paid little to nothing to work an eight hour shift, they get angry because it does not provide enough for them and their families. People who are paid minimum wage fall into this category because minimum wage does not pay enough to provide for basic needs of the average family. The result of this is that people earning minimum wage tend to†¦show more content†¦These both tend to describe certain aspects of wages and salaries as they relate to the benefits extended to employees. Minimum wage came about in 1938, during World War II under President Franklin Roosevelt, and is currently going on. Minimum wage was intended to help the poor, to protect them so that workers could not be cheated by employers who expect too long hours for too little pay; however, in recent years, a lot of people tried to help raise the minimum wage to ten dollars an hour to make it easier for workers in these jobs to make a living. Opponents of the minimum wage increase assert that raising minimum wage would also increase the cost of living for everyone, having an overall negative effect on the economy. There are, however, those who argue that a higher minimum wage would only benefit teen workers. So, would the cost of living go up due to the raise of minimum wage, or would it just benefit teens? In fact the living cost would go up due to a never ending cycle of a wage-price spiral, which says that rising wages increase disposable income, thus raising the demand for goods, and causing prices to rise. Rising prices cause demand for higher wages, which leads to higher production costs and further upward pressure on prices. So, even with a raise in minimum wage, people would still complain for more money due to the wage price spiral, and how everything will increase. However, it would not just benefit teens because the

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Cash Flow Horizons Conservatism Research -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Cash Flow Horizons Conservatism Research? Answer: Introducation As per the financial accounting principles, there might happen that the financial statement of organizations has assets that do not have excessive valuations. For ascertainment of value of assets, the carrying value of assets needs to be contrasted with some value concepts. Australian accounting standard boards under section 334 of Corporations Act, 2001 makes accounting standard AASB 136 impairment of assets. The objective of standards deals with prescribing the procedures that is applied by entity for ensuring that assets are not carried at more than recoverable amount. If the amount that is recorded after the sale of assets is less than carrying amount, then the assets are carried at recoverable amount. With reference to this, assets can be explained as impaired. Organization are required to recognize the impairment as per this standard as mandatory disclosures and time of recognizing impairment loss. If the recoverable amount is less than carrying value of assets, then the impairment is realised. The amount should be higher of fair value less value of assets in use and cost of selling. If the carrying value of an asset is more than their recoverable amount, then according to Paragraph 59 of AASB 136, then the carrying value of assets should be minimized to its former. As per AASB 2014, then such minimisation is adjudicated as an impairment loss. Nonetheless, there is variation in techniques that is used in variation of recording impairment loss and this is dependant upon fact that whether assets is recorded at costs and is pursuant to model of revaluation. Impairment loss needs to be realised immediately as per paragraph 60 of AASB 136. This is done unless the assets are carried at revalued amount that is ain compliance with another standard. The model of revaluation is denoted in standard that is in AASB 116. Therefore, as per the other standard, the impairment loss in relation to other assets are treated as decrease in revaluation (Banker et al., 2016). Revaluation model and cost model are the two methods that are used for impairing the assets. According to paragraph 61 of AASB 136, the cost model make use of cost for recording any assets that are impaired. Impairment of assets needs to be immediately recognized in profit and loss. It is indicative of the fact that loss associated with the asset impairment should be realized as expenditures in the income statement of organization. According to paragraph 60 of AASB 136, the impairment of assets such as plant, property and equipment is made at carrying value of re valued amount, then according to revaluation model, then the decrease in revaluation and treatment of loss related to impairment is identical. For the purpose of restatement in initial stage, the impairment loss in relation to assets that are impaired that is recorded in income statement. This is done for the reason that loss does not exceed the amount of revaluation surplus for the identical assets. The leftover account in revaluation surplus is accomplished by debiting the leftover of revaluation surplus account. Prior to recognizing the loss associated with impairment as expenditure in income statement, the surplus is applied and related to assets along with deferred tax liability. Nonetheless, there can be many instances, when the carrying value of assets in past is lower than recoverable amount of assets have been written down in value. It is essential on art of organization to ascertained any signs of loss of impairment that is realized in the past for any assets. However, this would exempt goodwill value and its existence in organization. All this is done as per Paragraph 110 of AASB 136. The reversal of loss of impairment of assets according to paragraph 111 of AASB 136requires external as well as internal signs of impairment. Some of the signals depicting assets impairment involves significant changes that involve or might have positive impact on organization, any rise in assets marketing value, favourable changes made in the utilization of assets, decline ion interest rate of market, and deviation in economic performance of assets (Crawford, 2016). There are two different models for carrying out loss of impairment of assets comprising of revaluation and cost model. Carrying value of assets cannot be raised beyond its value of depreciation for asset impairment in relation to cost model. Nonetheless, it is essential to consider the fact that policy of depreciation needs to be accounted in this case. Therefore, according to paragraph 119 of AASB 136, it is need to realise the impairment loss reversal as an item of expenditure in the income statement. This can be explained with the help of an instance, suppose an organization on 30th June 2014, has incurred an impairment loss on machinery of $ 13000. $ 11333 has been recorded as an assets carrying value that involves cost of $ $50,000 by deducting depreciation $25,667 and impairment accumulated loss at $ 13000. For period of six years, the rate of depreciation has been assumed at rate of 10%. The carrying asset value in this case is arrived at $ 20000. If the carrying value of assets needs to be restated at $ 18000, then the impairment loss that has been realized previously at $ 6667 can be reversed, since the recoverable value is more than loss of impairment. The impairment loss reversal in this case will be credited and loss arising from accumulated impairment is debited with $ 6667 amount. It has been assessed that recoverable amount of assets is recorded at $ 110000. Equipment, depreciation account and loss from impairment needs to be debited with amount $ 10000 each for recording impairment loss reversal of $ 20000. Deferred tax liability and revaluation surplus account will be credited in the income statement with value of $ 14000 and $ 6000 respectively. References Banker, R. D., Basu, S., Byzalov, D. (2016). Implications of Impairment Decisions and Assets' Cash-Flow Horizons for Conservatism Research.The Accounting Review,92(2), 41-67. Collison, D., Jansson, A., Larsson-Olaison, U., Power, D. M., Cooper, C., Gray, R., ... Jonnergrd, K. business-law. The Modern Corporation Statement on Accounting. Crawford, C. W. (2016). ACTG 201.05: Principles of Financial Accounting. Munter, P. (2017). FASB Simplifies Goodwill Impairment Accounting for Public Business Entities.Journal of Corporate Accounting Finance,28(5), 63-68.

Monday, December 2, 2019

Inmates Born In Jail Essays - Penology, Substance Abuse, Criminology

Inmates Born In Jail Substance abuse and addiction have changed the nature of America's prison population. Alcohol, drug abusers, addicts, and those who sell illegal drugs dominate state, federal prisons and local jails. Crime and alcohol and drug abuse go hand in hand. Much of the growth in America's inmate population is due to incarceration of drug law violators. With appropriate treatment for substance abuse and addiction, rehabilitation is possible for many of today's prisoners. Once they leave prison they also need continuing aftercare, education and job training. Without treatment and training, most will commit more crimes, get arrested and go back to prison. The choice is ours as well as theirs. Having a group counseling program consisting of 8 to 10 members and one or more trained Chemical Dependency Counselors would be beneficial. The purpose of the group is to provide a safe as well as a challenging place in which to work on personal and interpersonal concerns. Members can discuss their perception of each other and receive feedback on how others perceive them. Establishing trust allows group members to talk openly and honestly. Groups offer opportunity to experiment with different ways of communicating with others and a safe place to try new behaviors. They are able to give support and understanding, offer suggestions, or gently confront the person. Counselor and group members work together to establish trust and commitment to the group. Those who benefit most are usually those who take an active part in the process and who allow themselves to give and receive honest, helpful feedback. The following is information that I obtained from Lt. Kevin Peters at California Institute for Men. In 1980 the State of California had 12 prisons with 32,000 inmates. Today California has 33 prisons with 144,00 inmates. California Institution for Men (CIM) houses 6,500 of these inmates. Over 90% of the inmates at CIM are being incarcerated due to related alcohol and drug crimes. The average sentence is 41.4 months with inmates serving only 21.3 months. One inmate costs taxpayers approximately $232,291.00 for their 21.3 month incarceration, $150,000 for arrest and conviction, another $45,000 for additional bed and $21,470 for housing per year. CIM says 59% to 69% of the inmates are repeat offenders and have served time before. CIM feels it is just a place to house inmates and that there is no structure for rehabilitation. It is not their job to rehabilitate. CIM also states that the inmates have access to programs, such as AA, NA and Control of Substance Abuse for Mental Health. CIM feels that if an inmate wants to attend a program, it is available. It is not mandatory for them to attend and they cannot force an inmate to do so. The desire must be there for the inmate. Most inmates do not attend these programs since they are not mandatory. Most of the inmates dropped out of school due to substance abuse, the major contributing factor regarding their lack of interest in education. Additionally, many inmates come from poverty backgrounds. Why do we continue to release prisoners back to the community still using and still dealing, to commit further crimes and threaten our well-being and that of our children without treating the problem for which they went to prison? I feel that prisons would be a good place to develop the rehabilitation of offenders with substance abuse. The prison system needs to take on a mandatory substance abuse treatment program for all inmates incarcerated due to crimes related to drug use. Continuing to fund and build more prisons for housing offenders of drug abuse are a waste of taxpayers' money. Our prisons are full and the majority of inmates get early releases due to the problem of overcrowding, only to go out and commit more crimes. Drug addiction is a chronic disease. We treat people who have cancer, heart problems or any other disease. Although, the addicts have committed a crime, it doesn't change the fact that they have a disease, we must also treat those who have the disease of addiction. Looking over the different therapeutic community drug abuse treatment in prisons throughout the country, we may ask, why haven't all prisons adopted a program to treat inmates with an addiction on a mandatory basis? We must target these institutions because they house the parents of children and their child's future. If the parents are setting the example that drugs are okay and are doing time and repeated time, then what kind of future is in store for these children? Statistics show and